Volver a The Platta Law Firm, PLLC
Publicado por el bufete
Puntuación de confianza: 90%
Indemnización

$1.5 Million

Resumen del caso

El resumen publicado por el bufete se muestra en su idioma original.

This case involved a fall from a ladder at the jobsite. In 2010 the plaintiff was working on a renovation project at a public library. He was working on an A-frame ladder when the ladder shifted, causing him to fall. The plaintiff claimed that the ladder was not properly secured, as required by the law. The Court agreed and granted summary judgment for the plaintiff. As a result of the fall, the plaintiff required surgery to his lumbar and cervical spine.

Fuente de evidencia

El título y los datos de la fuente se muestran en su idioma original.

The Platta Law Firm, PLLC · Published results page

Ver fuente original
Visto por primera vez: August 27, 2026
Última revisión: August 27, 2026

Detalles del registro

Categoría
Resbalones, tropiezos y caídas
Tipo de resultado
Indemnización
Año
2010
Ubicación
NY

Explora este tipo de caso

Resbalones, tropiezos y caídas bufetes en Manhattan con resultados publicadosCompara $1.3 Million indemnización publicada: $1,300,000 Client was walking up the stairs from the ground floor to the first floor when he tripped on the last step — an unsafe 10-inch riser that created a serious hazard. The building had only one railing, and the dangerous condition had been reported many times to both the current and prior owners, as well as the superintendent. More than 10 years earlier, another person had died after falling on the same staircase, yet no repairs were made. de The Platta Law Firm, PLLCCompara $845,000 indemnización publicada: $845,000 This case involved a worker injured while performing renovation work of a country club. He was cutting shingles for baseboard installation with a handsaw, when the hand saw kicked back and struck his left hand. The rotating saw blade got entangled in his glove cutting into his hand. In an effort to save his hand, he reflexively stood up while trying to pull the saw out of the glove and stepped back on the rocks scattered on top of the slippery tarp, causing him to trip, slip and fall back. As a result of this accident, plaintiff sustained herniations in his lower back and tears in... de The Platta Law Firm, PLLCCompara $1.5 Million indemnización publicada: $1,500,000 This case involved a worker who was struck by a tar bucket which fell from a hoist’s container while being hoisted down by his coworkers from the roof of the five/six-story school building. There was no planking in the hoistway to protect against falling objects, no tag lines to control swaying of the hoist’s container while in motion. As a result of this accident, plaintiff sustained serious injuries, including a bimalleolar fracture and transverse fracture of the medial malleolus of the left ankle which required open reduction internal fixation surgery to repair. He also... de The Platta Law Firm, PLLCCompara $2.25 Million indemnización publicada: $2,250,000 This case involved a commercial plumber performing renovation work at a residential building. The entire plumbing system was being demolished and replaced. While removing a pipe from the ceiling with two co-workers, the pipe fell and swung towards plaintiff. It struck plaintiff in his hand, wrist, and arm, before striking the ladder plaintiff was standing on, and knocking plaintiff into the wall. As a result of this accident, plaintiff sustained serious injuries, including, but not limited to injuries to his left arm requiring surgery, injuries to his cervical spine requiring... de The Platta Law Firm, PLLCCompara $3.25 Million indemnización publicada: $3,250,000 A 44 year old plumber, was injured while renovating a mixed use building on Central Park South in Manhattan. As he was attempting to repair a leaking pipe, he slipped on plastic sheeting that was being used to temporarily protect a staircase leading to the subway station below the building. He suffered injuries requiring surgery to his lumbar spine, and his right shoulder and ankle as well as injuries to his neck, head and both wrists. The defendant building owner and general contractor tried to argue the accident was the Plaintiff’s fault and that his injuries preexisted his... de The Platta Law Firm, PLLC